hack3rs.ca network-security
/learning/tools/security-onion :: tool-guide-5

defender@hack3rs:~/learning/tools$ open security-onion

Security Onion

Blue team platform

Security Onion is an integrated blue-team platform combining network visibility, host visibility, log collection, detections, and analyst workflows. It is excellent for labs, training, and operational SOC-style deployments.

how-to-learn-this-tool-like-a-defender

Study the tool in layers: first what problem it solves, then how to run it safely, then how to interpret output, and finally how to combine it with other evidence. This is how beginners become reliable analysts.

  • $Know when the tool is the right choice (and when it is not).
  • $Run a safe baseline command in a lab or authorized environment.
  • $Interpret the output in context instead of treating it as truth by itself.
  • $Correlate with other evidence sources (logs, packets, assets, owner context).
  • $Document findings and next actions so another analyst can reproduce your work.

preflight-checklist-before-using-tool

  • $Confirm authorization, target scope, and acceptable impact before running commands.
  • $Define the question first (troubleshooting, validation, hunting, triage, remediation proof).
  • $Identify the evidence source you will use to confirm or challenge tool output.
  • $Record time, host, interface/segment, and command used so results are reproducible.
  • $Decide what 'normal' should look like before testing edge cases or suspicious behavior.

how-experts-read-output

  • $Field recognition: Which fields actually matter for the question you asked?
  • $Scope validation: Does this output represent the host/segment/time window you intended?
  • $Confidence check: Is this direct evidence, inference, or a heuristic guess?
  • $Correlation step: Which second source should confirm this result (logs, PCAP, ticket, CMDB, host telemetry)?
  • $Decision step: What action should follow (close, escalate, tune, scan deeper, validate manually)?

official-links

open docs Official Security Onion documentation about Platform overview and architecture concepts release notes Version and update notes

ethical-use-and-defense-scope

Use Security Onion only in environments where you are authorized to collect and analyze security telemetry. Because it centralizes network and host data, it can expose sensitive information if deployed without clear governance.

Be explicit about what data sources you ingest and who can access them. Security Onion is a security operations platform, not a general surveillance platform; access should be role-based and tied to defensive responsibilities.

When using Security Onion for training, prefer lab data or synthetic traffic. If you mirror production traffic for testing, apply the same privacy and retention safeguards you would use for any enterprise telemetry system.

tool-history-origin-and-purpose

  • $When created: Started as a free/open project in 2008 (with the platform growing significantly across later releases).
  • $Why it was created: Blue teams often struggled to assemble, tune, and operate many separate tools for network visibility, host visibility, alerts, and case workflows. Security Onion was created to reduce that integration burden.

Doug Burks created Security Onion to make enterprise-grade defensive monitoring more accessible by integrating multiple security tools into a usable platform for defenders.

why-defenders-still-use-it

People use Security Onion because it provides a practical blue-team platform that combines visibility, detection, search, and case management into one operational environment. It helps teams move faster from telemetry to investigation.

How the tool evolved
  • +Began as a free/open project and later matured into a broader platform used by many security teams.
  • +Integrated core network and host telemetry tools into a more coherent analyst workflow.
  • +Became a common training and lab platform because it helps learners see how tools fit together.

when-this-tool-is-a-good-fit

  • +SOC lab training with integrated network and host telemetry.
  • +Pilot blue-team monitoring deployments where integration speed matters.
  • +Alert triage and case workflows with centralized data views.
  • +Detection tuning and validation using unified telemetry and investigation tools.

when-to-use-another-tool-or-source

  • !When you need host process/user context, pair with endpoint or OS logs.
  • !When you need ownership and business impact, pair with CMDB/ticketing/asset context.
  • !When the tool output is ambiguous, validate using a second evidence source before concluding.
  • !When production risk is high, test in a lab first and use change coordination.

1. What Security Onion Provides

Security Onion packages multiple blue-team capabilities into a cohesive platform: network telemetry, IDS/IPS detections, log management, host visibility options, case workflows, and management tooling. It helps teams avoid assembling every component from scratch.

For learners, this is a major advantage. You can see how network sensors, alerts, queries, and investigations fit together in one environment, which accelerates understanding of end-to-end SOC workflows.

For operational teams, Security Onion provides a practical way to deploy integrated monitoring and analysis capabilities while keeping flexibility for tuning, data source selection, and operational maturity.

2. Architecture and Deployment Mindset

Security Onion can be deployed in different sizes and roles, from a small lab instance to a distributed deployment. The key is to start with a clear use case: training lab, pilot monitoring segment, or production-focused deployment.

Defenders should understand where data comes from (network taps, SPAN ports, endpoints, logs), where it is processed, and how analysts query and investigate it. Platform familiarity reduces confusion when alerts appear or pipelines fail.

As with any telemetry platform, placement and data quality matter more than interface features. A polished UI cannot compensate for poor sensor placement, missing logs, or inconsistent host identity metadata.

3. Blue Team Workflows Inside the Platform

Security Onion is most valuable when used to support a consistent analyst workflow: alert review, evidence gathering, event correlation, case notes, and escalation. Teams should define this workflow early so analysts do not improvise differently on every alert.

It can support both reactive and proactive work. Reactive work includes triaging alerts and investigating suspicious hosts. Proactive work includes hunting, trend review, gap analysis, and detection tuning based on observed traffic and host activity.

Learners should practice tracing a single event across data types: an alert to network logs, then to related host context, then to analyst notes and disposition. This is where the platform becomes a training resource rather than just a dashboard.

4. Operational Maintenance and Data Hygiene

Integrated platforms require maintenance discipline. Monitor ingestion health, storage usage, sensor status, update processes, and parser quality. Analysts lose trust quickly if data arrives late, disappears, or is inconsistent.

Retention planning matters. Security Onion can centralize a lot of telemetry, and storage pressure will affect what you can keep for investigations. Prioritize data sources based on investigative value and legal/business requirements.

Document platform changes, data source additions, and detection updates. This helps explain sudden shifts in alert volume or query results and supports smoother onboarding for new analysts.

5. Training With Security Onion

Security Onion is excellent for blue-team labs because it exposes the relationships between sensors, logs, detections, and cases. Build small scenarios (scanning, suspicious DNS, web attacks, malware simulation in a safe lab) and practice end-to-end investigations.

Use repeatable datasets or lab exercises so you can compare results over time. This helps you learn the platform interface and query patterns while also improving your analytical thinking.

Treat platform training as operational training, not just tool clicking. Focus on why a query is useful, what evidence it proves, and how it changes a response decision.

6. Security Onion in a Mature Defense Program

In mature environments, Security Onion can serve as a core visibility and investigation platform, but it still needs processes around detection engineering, asset context, escalation, and response. Tools centralize data; teams create outcomes.

Success depends on role clarity: who owns sensors, who manages rules, who handles investigations, who updates playbooks, and who reviews continuous-improvement items after incidents.

Whether in a home lab or a production SOC, the most important skill is learning to produce defensible conclusions from integrated telemetry rather than treating the platform as an alert counter.

7. Responsible and Ethical Use in Organizations

Because Security Onion can aggregate broad telemetry, organizations should set clear policies for access, retention, incident handling, and query logging. Analysts should only access data needed for security operations tasks.

Avoid “just in case” collection without data classification or retention decisions. Ethical defensive monitoring balances operational visibility with user privacy, legal requirements, and organizational transparency.

Use documented incident and threat-hunting workflows so analyst activity is explainable and reviewable. Good governance improves trust in the security team and reduces misuse risk.

scenario-teaching-playbooks

Use these scenario patterns to practice choosing the tool appropriately. The point is not just running commands; it is learning when and why the tool helps in a real defensive workflow.

1. SOC lab training with integrated network and host telemetry.

Suggested starting block: Initial Setup And Status Checks

  • $Define the question you are trying to answer and the scope you are allowed to inspect.
  • $Collect baseline evidence using the selected command block.
  • $Interpret the result using known-good behavior and environment context.
  • $Correlate with another source (host logs, SIEM, tickets, inventory, or packet data).
  • $Record findings, confidence level, and the next defensive action.

2. Pilot blue-team monitoring deployments where integration speed matters.

Suggested starting block: Operational Health And Diagnostics

  • $Define the question you are trying to answer and the scope you are allowed to inspect.
  • $Collect baseline evidence using the selected command block.
  • $Interpret the result using known-good behavior and environment context.
  • $Correlate with another source (host logs, SIEM, tickets, inventory, or packet data).
  • $Record findings, confidence level, and the next defensive action.

3. Alert triage and case workflows with centralized data views.

Suggested starting block: Lab Workflow Notes

  • $Define the question you are trying to answer and the scope you are allowed to inspect.
  • $Collect baseline evidence using the selected command block.
  • $Interpret the result using known-good behavior and environment context.
  • $Correlate with another source (host logs, SIEM, tickets, inventory, or packet data).
  • $Record findings, confidence level, and the next defensive action.

4. Detection tuning and validation using unified telemetry and investigation tools.

Suggested starting block: Initial Setup And Status Checks

  • $Define the question you are trying to answer and the scope you are allowed to inspect.
  • $Collect baseline evidence using the selected command block.
  • $Interpret the result using known-good behavior and environment context.
  • $Correlate with another source (host logs, SIEM, tickets, inventory, or packet data).
  • $Record findings, confidence level, and the next defensive action.

cli-workflows

Practical defensive workflows and lab-safe commands. Validate in a sandbox or authorized environment before using them in production.

cli-walkthroughs-with-expected-output

Start with one representative command from each workflow block. Read the sample output and explanation so you know what to look for when you run it yourself.

Initial Setup And Status Checks

Beginner
Command
sudo so-setup
Example Output
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ how to read it: Check for expected fields first, then validate whether the output actually answers your question. If not, refine scope or collect a second evidence source before concluding.

Operational Health And Diagnostics

Intermediate
Command
sudo so-checkin
Example Output
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ how to read it: Check for expected fields first, then validate whether the output actually answers your question. If not, refine scope or collect a second evidence source before concluding.

Lab Workflow Notes

Advanced
Command
mkdir -p ~/security-onion-labs
Example Output
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ how to read it: Check for expected fields first, then validate whether the output actually answers your question. If not, refine scope or collect a second evidence source before concluding.

command-anatomy-and-expert-usage

This breaks down each command so learners understand intent, risk, and interpretation. Expert use is not about memorizing syntax; it is about selecting the right command for the right question and reading the result correctly.

Initial Setup And Status Checks

Beginner
Command
sudo so-setup
Command Anatomy
  • $Base command: sudo
  • $Primary arguments/options: so-setup
  • $Operator goal: run this command only when it answers a clear defensive question.
Use And Risk

$ intent: Platform setup, status, or health checks for Security Onion.

$ risk: Medium-High: may affect services/platform state depending on command and environment.

$ learning focus: Baseline command: learn what normal output looks like.

Show sample output and interpretation notes 
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ expert reading pattern: Confirm the output matches your intended scope, identify the key fields, then validate with a second source before making decisions.

Initial Setup And Status Checks

Beginner
Command
sudo so-status
Command Anatomy
  • $Base command: sudo
  • $Primary arguments/options: so-status
  • $Operator goal: run this command only when it answers a clear defensive question.
Use And Risk

$ intent: Platform setup, status, or health checks for Security Onion.

$ risk: Review command impact before running; validate in lab first if uncertain.

$ learning focus: Intermediate step: refine scope or extract more useful evidence.

Show sample output and interpretation notes 
Security Onion Status
manager: running
search: running
sensor: healthy

$ expert reading pattern: Confirm the output matches your intended scope, identify the key fields, then validate with a second source before making decisions.

Initial Setup And Status Checks

Beginner
Command
sudo so-test
Command Anatomy
  • $Base command: sudo
  • $Primary arguments/options: so-test
  • $Operator goal: run this command only when it answers a clear defensive question.
Use And Risk

$ intent: Platform setup, status, or health checks for Security Onion.

$ risk: Review command impact before running; validate in lab first if uncertain.

$ learning focus: Advanced step: use after baseline and validation are understood.

Show sample output and interpretation notes 
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ expert reading pattern: Confirm the output matches your intended scope, identify the key fields, then validate with a second source before making decisions.

Operational Health And Diagnostics

Intermediate
Command
sudo so-checkin
Command Anatomy
  • $Base command: sudo
  • $Primary arguments/options: so-checkin
  • $Operator goal: run this command only when it answers a clear defensive question.
Use And Risk

$ intent: Platform setup, status, or health checks for Security Onion.

$ risk: Review command impact before running; validate in lab first if uncertain.

$ learning focus: Baseline command: learn what normal output looks like.

Show sample output and interpretation notes 
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ expert reading pattern: Confirm the output matches your intended scope, identify the key fields, then validate with a second source before making decisions.

Operational Health And Diagnostics

Intermediate
Command
sudo so-allow
Command Anatomy
  • $Base command: sudo
  • $Primary arguments/options: so-allow
  • $Operator goal: run this command only when it answers a clear defensive question.
Use And Risk

$ intent: Platform setup, status, or health checks for Security Onion.

$ risk: Review command impact before running; validate in lab first if uncertain.

$ learning focus: Intermediate step: refine scope or extract more useful evidence.

Show sample output and interpretation notes 
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ expert reading pattern: Confirm the output matches your intended scope, identify the key fields, then validate with a second source before making decisions.

Operational Health And Diagnostics

Intermediate
Command
sudo docker ps | head
Command Anatomy
  • $Base command: sudo
  • $Primary arguments/options: docker ps | head
  • $Operator goal: run this command only when it answers a clear defensive question.
Use And Risk

$ intent: Platform setup, status, or health checks for Security Onion.

$ risk: Review command impact before running; validate in lab first if uncertain.

$ learning focus: Intermediate step: refine scope or extract more useful evidence.

Show sample output and interpretation notes 
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ expert reading pattern: Confirm the output matches your intended scope, identify the key fields, then validate with a second source before making decisions.

Operational Health And Diagnostics

Intermediate
Command
sudo journalctl -xe --no-pager | tail -100
Command Anatomy
  • $Base command: sudo
  • $Primary arguments/options: journalctl -xe --no-pager | tail
  • $Operator goal: run this command only when it answers a clear defensive question.
Use And Risk

$ intent: Collect, validate, or document evidence in a defensive workflow.

$ risk: Review command impact before running; validate in lab first if uncertain.

$ learning focus: Advanced step: use after baseline and validation are understood.

Show sample output and interpretation notes 
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ expert reading pattern: Confirm the output matches your intended scope, identify the key fields, then validate with a second source before making decisions.

Lab Workflow Notes

Advanced
Command
mkdir -p ~/security-onion-labs
Command Anatomy
  • $Base command: mkdir
  • $Primary arguments/options: -p ~/security-onion-labs
  • $Operator goal: run this command only when it answers a clear defensive question.
Use And Risk

$ intent: Collect, validate, or document evidence in a defensive workflow.

$ risk: Review command impact before running; validate in lab first if uncertain.

$ learning focus: Baseline command: learn what normal output looks like.

Show sample output and interpretation notes 
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ expert reading pattern: Confirm the output matches your intended scope, identify the key fields, then validate with a second source before making decisions.

Lab Workflow Notes

Advanced
Command
printf "Scenario
Data sources
Expected detections
Actual findings
" > ~/security-onion-labs/session-01.txt
Command Anatomy
  • $Base command: printf
  • $Primary arguments/options: "Scenario Data sources Expected detections
  • $Operator goal: run this command only when it answers a clear defensive question.
Use And Risk

$ intent: Collect, validate, or document evidence in a defensive workflow.

$ risk: Review command impact before running; validate in lab first if uncertain.

$ learning focus: Intermediate step: refine scope or extract more useful evidence.

Show sample output and interpretation notes 
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ expert reading pattern: Confirm the output matches your intended scope, identify the key fields, then validate with a second source before making decisions.

Lab Workflow Notes

Advanced
Command
nano ~/security-onion-labs/session-01.txt
Command Anatomy
  • $Base command: nano
  • $Primary arguments/options: ~/security-onion-labs/session-01.txt
  • $Operator goal: run this command only when it answers a clear defensive question.
Use And Risk

$ intent: Collect, validate, or document evidence in a defensive workflow.

$ risk: Review command impact before running; validate in lab first if uncertain.

$ learning focus: Advanced step: use after baseline and validation are understood.

Show sample output and interpretation notes 
# review output for expected fields, errors, and warnings
# compare against a known-good baseline in your environment

$ expert reading pattern: Confirm the output matches your intended scope, identify the key fields, then validate with a second source before making decisions.

Initial Setup And Status Checks

sudo so-setup
sudo so-status
sudo so-test

Operational Health And Diagnostics

sudo so-checkin
sudo so-allow
sudo docker ps | head
sudo journalctl -xe --no-pager | tail -100

Lab Workflow Notes

mkdir -p ~/security-onion-labs
printf "Scenario
Data sources
Expected detections
Actual findings
" > ~/security-onion-labs/session-01.txt
nano ~/security-onion-labs/session-01.txt

defensive-use-cases

  • $SOC lab training with integrated network and host telemetry.
  • $Pilot blue-team monitoring deployments where integration speed matters.
  • $Alert triage and case workflows with centralized data views.
  • $Detection tuning and validation using unified telemetry and investigation tools.

common-mistakes

  • $Deploying the platform without defining analyst workflows or ownership.
  • $Overcollecting data without storage/retention planning.
  • $Treating the UI as the workflow instead of building documented triage and response processes.
  • $Ignoring ingestion and sensor health until an incident requires missing data.

expert-habits-for-free-self-study

This site is a free teaching resource. Use this loop to train yourself like a working defender: ask a question, collect evidence, interpret carefully, validate, document, and repeat.

  • $Start with the least invasive command that can answer your question.
  • $Write down why you ran the command before interpreting the output.
  • $Treat output as evidence, not truth, until validated against another source.
  • $Save exact commands used so another analyst can reproduce your findings.
  • $Capture 'normal' examples during calm periods for future comparison.
  • $Escalate only after you can explain what you observed and why it matters.

knowledge-check

  • ?What question is this tool best suited to answer first?
  • ?What permissions or scope approvals are needed before using it?
  • ?Which second evidence source should you pair with it for higher confidence?
  • ?What does normal output look like for your environment?

teaching-answer-guide

Show teaching hints
  • #Start from the tool’s role and the scenario you are investigating.
  • #Never rely on one tool alone for high-confidence incident decisions.
  • #Document normal output patterns during calm periods so anomalies are easier to spot.
  • #Prefer lab validation for new commands, rules, or scans before production use.

practice-plan

# Deploy a lab instance and ingest a small set of network and host telemetry.
# Run a simulated scenario and trace it through alert, search, and case workflow steps.
# Document one operational runbook for platform health checks and data verification.
# Review retention and access controls as part of the lab design, not after the fact.

related-tools-in-this-path

Continue within the same guided track. These tools are commonly studied next in the path(s) this page belongs to.

<- previous tool Suricata -> next tool OpenVAS / Greenbone CE